What. The. Actual. Hell?! Chicago police officer who killed teen sues family for $10m

0
Police brutality - American Police Sues Victim's Family $10m -1

Police brutality - American Police Sues Victim's Family $10m -1
Every time I think my heart cannot break anymore over police brutality in the USA, the cops causing the outrage and doing the murdering just seem to keep raising the ante.

I have no words for this story, so I’m just going to lay it on you the same way I was told.

According to Yahoo News, a Chicago policeman who shot dead a teenager and accidentally killed a neighbour is seeking $10m (£7m) damages from the boy’s family.

Yup, you heard that right. Apparently, Robert Rialmo claimed the shooting in Chicago on 26 December left him traumatised.

The officer has now filed a lawsuit against the relatives of 19-year-old black student Quintonio LeGrier.

In the days after the death, the victim’s father Antonio LeGrier filed a wrongful death lawsuit, saying his son was not armed with a weapon and was not a threat. His lawyer Basileios Foutris has criticised the officer’s “temerity” in suing the grieving family.

He said: “That’s a new low even for the Chicago Police Department. First you shoot them, then you sue them.”

The police officer, Rialmo, has given his first public account of how he said the shooting happened, including details different to the family’s version of events.

He and another officer were responding to a domestic disturbance call at a two-storey apartment building in the city.

The policer officer claims Quintonio LeGrier ran downstairs and swung a baseball bat at his head, missing it by inches, according to the lawsuit.

The officer told the teenager to drop it but the youth tried to hit him again at close range and when he raised his bat for a third time, the officer pulled out his 9mm handgun and opened fire, it added.

Neighbour Bettie Jones, 55, who was standing nearby, was shot and killed by accident and was not part of the dispute, it went on.

Lawyers for Antonio LeGrier and Jones say the evidence indicates Rialmo was 20 to 30ft away when he fired, calling into question the officer’s claim he feared for his life.

The legal action comes at a time when the police force is trying to win back public trust after a number of deadly shootings, including several cases of alleged officer misconduct.

Rialmo’s lawyer Joel Brodsky said it was important to send a message that police are “not targets for assaults” and “suffer damage like anybody else”.

So…basically, you’re upset, sorry TRAUMATISED that his behaviour led you to shoot him. At point blank range, if your version is to believed. Alive, un-buried, still white, still working, still kissing family every night, but traumatised. And the family need to pay for that.

And with what funds, pray, is the family supposed to pay you for your gruesome windfall? From their rainy day ‘kill my son’ lottery they keep in a savings account?

And how does the cheeky officer even come up with this number? Is his ‘distress’ worth £7m ? Can he no longer work? Ever? Not even a desk job?

If I’m to do the maths, £7m equates to £175k per year if we are to look at a 40 year career. Is that the going wage for police brutality these days? I must buy a plane ticket and check out the classifieds sections in a US newspaper one of these days.

Ugh.

Get more stuff like this
in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

Leave a Reply